Covenant Versus Non-Covenant Ministering

While sitting in a course on how to counsel children, I asked the question of how one would make the distinction between covenant and non-covenant children, and in particular if the teacher made such a distinction. The teacher didn’t, although she acknowledges there is a difference and considered giving it further thought.

I am currently working on a couple of school projects where I am focusing on the covenant relationship of the Bible and how a proper understanding impacts our ministering, counseling, and addressing the needs and sins of people. I am in particular interested in the covenantal relationship of families and how someone ministers to families who have raised their children in the context of a Christian home and those who have not. I think ministering from this perspective will take two different paths because it is two different ways of thinking about loving and caring for people – those inside and those outside the covenant. For those of you familiar with covenant theology, do you think there is a difference in the way you would minister to someone, particularly a child?

Posted in Covenant | Tagged ,






Email | 2 Replies

Obstinate Toy Soldiers

In the next two chapters, Lewis continues to present Christianity, but he tries to do so in a contemporary setting. Remember, he is writing this book in the late 1940s England, a very different context than we have today and very different from the setting of the Scriptures. What Lewis attempts to do is frame Christianity in such a way that it makes sense to the reader of his time.

Lewis begins the chapter entitled The Obstinate Toy Soldiers by trying to imagine the Christian life had Adam and Eve never eaten of the forbidden fruit and been banished from the garden, but this is trivial thinking. As Lewis suggests, there is no sense in having our thoughts dwell there; it is better to deal with what is at hand.

The issue at hand is the fallen, sinful, obstinate world in which we now live, striving for greatness and recognition at the cost of others. Whether we choose to recognize it or not, we are a selfish people; we are our own biggest cheerleader. Lewis puts it this way:

The natural life in each of us is something self-centered, something that wants to be petted and admired, to take advantage of other lives, to exploit the whole universe. And especially it wants to be left to itself: to keep well away from anything better or stronger or higher than it, anything that might make it feel small. It is afraid of the light and air of the spiritual world, just as people who have been brought up to be dirty are afraid of a bath” (155).

Selfishness is a natural part of our very humanity, yet an essential part of the Christian life, beginning at conversion, is a need to die to that part in order to make room for more important matters.

Lewis’ primary emphasis in this chapter is that the coming of Christ did something for humanity that was not fully realized until then, and we still struggle to understand it fully now. Through the life, death, and resurrection of Christ, we have been united to one another through Him in such a way humanity has never known before. Lewis says, “If you could see humanity spread out in time, as God sees it, it would not look like a lot of separate things dotted about. It would look like one single growing thing – rather like a very complicated tree” (157). Imagine that – a organic unit growing out and yet together in such a way that it forms a complex network of interconnectedness – quite the opposite from an obstinate toy soldier!

What is even more amazing is that God has done the work for us. He has given His Son on behalf of a fallen humanity to find salvation through faith in Him. “We have not got to try to climb up into spiritual life by our own efforts; it has already come down into the human race” (157).

After Lewis presented this section, some critics wrote to him asking about a simple but challenging question. Why didn’t God beget more sons like Himself rather than making sons and then going through such a dreadful journey? It’s a legitimate question. However, Lewis, in his wonderful wisdom, presents the dreadful situation of Adam and Eve’s active rebellion and obstinate allegiance when God gave them a choice with one prohibition, and he concludes by addressing the “could have been” that many of us find ourselves asking.

Anyone studying the Bible needs to remember this simple question: “Have the words ‘Could have been’ any sense at all when applied to God?” Of course the answer is “No”. Part of the Christian life is resting in some truths without having to figure them out or question their significance. The Bible presents the problem of evil and suffering in the world, and then it presents the solution – the Son of Man. Can we ask if God could have done things differently? Yes. Would it be helpful? No!

An equally challenging question about Christianity is the issue of identity. If I become a Christian, does that mean I lose my particular identity and have to conform to something not like me? Shockingly, the answer is yes and no. Being “in Christ” means living to the greatest extent of your being while dying to your own selfish wants and desires; it requires seeing yourself as more than what you already do – as part of an organic unit working together for something greater than yourself.

Christianity thinks of human individuals not as mere members of a group or items in a list, but as organs in a body – different from one another and each contributing what no other could. When you find yourself wanting to turn your children, or pupils, or even your neighbours, in to people exactly like yourself, remember that God probably never meant them to be that. You and they are different organs, intended to do different things (161).

The Christian life is one of sacrifice but not a sacrifice that leads to resentment or loneliness. The Christian life builds upon the foundation and work laid through the work of Christ. We each serve a particular and unique part in that work. As Christians, we should seek new ways to encourage one another as we navigate the difficulties of this fallen world knowing that our labors serve a greater purpose than we could ever imagine for ourselves.

The Eternal Nature of God & His Love

In the next two chapters, Time and Beyond Time and Good Infection, Lewis takes a deeper look at the eternal nature of God. Lewis wants the reader to understand that an understanding of God and how He relates to time is not a crucial aspect to Christianity, but it is helpful to understand how God has existed from all eternity.

I think it is important to remember that we are finite, limited people trying to grasp the infinite understanding of God, and we will always fall short. We can never truly grasp the complexity of God as He knows Himself. Adam and Eve attempted this, and we continue to experience the pains of their rebellion as it continues in ourselves.

Dr. John Currid, professor of Old Testament at Reformed Theological Seminary, drew attention to the fact that one of the greatest gifts the Jewish people gave mankind was a linear view of time. There was a distinct beginning, and we continue along a trajectory. However, as Lewis says, we have characterized God functioning in the same way. “We tend to assume that the whole universe and God Himself are always moving on from past to future just as we do” (147).

The problem with this view is that it makes God limited and reactionary. God, not knowing the “full” picture of time and eternity, is always reacting to the actions of humanity. Thus, it makes Him limited in His power and sovereignty over creation. I don’t think that is the God of the Bible; that’s not an accurate picture of the eternal nature of God.

At the same time, we have to avoid over-simplifying Lewis’ view as well. I fully believe God stands outside time in that He is not bound by the progression from past to future. The first word of the Hebrew Bible testifies to this: “In the beginning…”. That very word demonstrates God standing outside time, but it also shows God actively involved in His creation.

In other words, we do not want to underestimate the personal nature of God – the God who condescends and meets His people where they are. To argue that God is a “Divine Watchmaker” is a gross misinterpretation of Scripture and the character of God. He did not create Creation and then set things into motion, only to take a “hands-off” approach; He created the world and all that inhabits it and is actively involved in all aspects.

There is nothing, in all of Scripture and Creation, that exemplifies God’s personal nature more thoroughly than the relationship between the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. In the next chapter, Good Infection, Lewis’ premise lies in the eternal, personal nature of the Triune God: “The Son exists because the Father exists: but there never was a time before the Father produced the Son” (151).

A very important and crucial aspect of God’s personality is love, but it is a love very different than how the world now thinks of love.

Love is something that one person has for another person. If God was a single person, then before the world was made, He was not love… They [Christians] believe that the living, dynamic activity of love has been going on in God for ever and has created everything else… And that, by the way, is perhaps the more important difference between Christianity and all other religions: that in Christianity God is not a static thing – not even a person – but a dynamic, pulsating activity, a life, almost a kind of drama (152).

The loving quality of God is evident in the person and work of Christ and the Holy Spirit, who are God in being but different persons of the Trinity.

Lewis puts the person and work of the Trinity in perspective. He says, “In the Christian life you are not usually looking at Him: He is always acting through you. If you think of the Father as something ‘out there,’ in front of you, and of the Son as someone standing at your side, helping you to pray, trying to turn you into another son, then you have to think of the third Person as something inside you, or behind you” (153).

I think it is important to understand that the primary nature of God is characterized by love, a love that pursues a people that flee from the presence of God out of rebellion. Yet, God does not waver from His enduring and persistent love; He simply cannot! How is this most evident? He sacrifices His Son for the sins which one cannot atone by human means. It is only through the work of Christ that one can be forgiven and the Holy Sprit moves in the heart to believe.

We shall love the Father as He does and the Holy Ghost will arise in us. He came to this world and became a man in order to spread to other men the kind of life He has – by what I call ‘good infection,’ Every Christian is to become a little Christ. The whole purpose of becoming a Christian is simply nothing else (154).

Posted in Mere Christianity, Virtual Book Club






Email | Leave a reply